Bug 225240

Summary: Merge Review: alchemist
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: twaugh
Target Milestone: ---Flags: gwync: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-14 13:29:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-29 20:59:44 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: alchemist

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/alchemist/

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-04 19:11:14 UTC
rpmlint on SRPM:

alchemist.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file
/tmp/alchemist-1.0.37-2.fc8.src.rpm.5684/alchemist.spec
The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8.  Convert it for
example using iconv(1).

alchemist.src:10: W: prereq-use /sbin/ldconfig
The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires
is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post),
Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq.

alchemist.src:13: W: buildprereq-use libxml2 >= 2.3.8, libxslt >= 0.9.0,
libxslt-devel >= 0.9.0
The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required
before a package can be built.  Use plain BuildRequires instead.

alchemist.src:14: W: buildprereq-use doxygen >= 1.2.7, python-devel, zlib-devel
The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required
before a package can be built.  Use plain BuildRequires instead.

alchemist.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A multi-sourced configuration back-end.
Summary ends with a dot.

alchemist.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.

alchemist.src: W: no-url-tag
The URL tag is missing.

All need fixing.

rpmlint on RPMS:

alchemist-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/alchemist/blackbox/libforgeblackbox.so libforgeblackbox.so.0.0.0
The relative symbolic link points nowhere.

Should be OK.


In addition, the Source0 tag should include a URL, which should match what I'd
find on the site in the URL.

Static libs need to be in a -static package or dropped entirely.  .la should be
removed unless critically needed.

Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers.

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2008-02-13 13:21:01 UTC
Fixed in 1.0.37-4.fc9, except for:

URL tag: there is no upstream URL for this project, and never has been.

Dangling symlink: the devel package requires the main package, which provides
the target of this symlink.  There are many other packages that do the same thing.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-13 13:52:55 UTC
Ok on the symlink.  A few of mine do that too. :)

As for upstream, you'll need to get a spot on hosted.fp.org, and update this
accordingly.



Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2008-02-13 14:00:53 UTC
Not worth the effort -- no new development should be made against alchemist.  It
is only kept around for the (very few) remaining packages that still use it.

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-13 14:10:41 UTC
Ok, that makes sense.  Document that in the Spec, approximately where the URL
tag would be, and I'll be happy.

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-13 14:15:25 UTC
I see that only s-c-httpd and s-c-netboot require this.  What is replacing this,
that these will be migrating to, just out of curiosity?

Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2008-02-14 13:08:23 UTC
Documented in spec.  The replacement is for configuration tools to directly
configure the files they are configuring.

Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-14 13:29:37 UTC
Beautiful.  Thank you!

APPROVED.