Bug 2252779

Summary: Resurrect "rados cppool" requiring --yes-i-really-mean-it for pools with selfmanaged snaphots
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Pawan <pdhiran>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact: Disha Walvekar <dwalveka>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.2CC: bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, dwalveka, idryomov, mgowri, ngangadh, nojha, pdhange, rzarzyns, tserlin, vasawant, vumrao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 7.0z2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.0-183.el9cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, rados cppool did not ask for confirmation for operations with pools having self managed snapshots unlike the other Ceph commands. The rados cppool does not preserve self managed snapshots when copying a pool and it should be used with care and awareness on pools with self managed snapshots like the RBD pools. Also, the obligatory switch is not enforced for RBD pools. With this fix, rados cpppool ceases the operation and exits with a warning even if the user misses the switch and asks to confirm the operation with `--yes-i-really-mean-it` for pools with self managed snapshots. The fix brings it back. Now, if user misses the switch, `rados cpppool` ceases the operation and exists with a warning.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2248152 Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-05-07 12:10:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2270485    

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2024-05-07 12:10:24 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:2743
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-09-07 04:25:07 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days