Bug 2253792

Summary:	Review Request: aflnet - AFLNet: A Greybox Fuzzer for Network Protocols
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Petr Menšík <pemensik>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	benson_muite, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	https://github.com/aflnet/aflnet
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-01-03 00:45:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Petr Menšík 2023-12-09 19:04:47 UTC

Spec URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/aflnet.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/aflnet-2.56b^20230922git62d63a59-0.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
AFLNet is a greybox fuzzer for protocol implementations. Unlike existing
protocol fuzzers, it takes a mutational approach and uses state-feedback,
in addition to code-coverage feedback, to guide the fuzzing process. AFLNet
is seeded with a corpus of recorded message exchanges between the server and
an actual client. No protocol specification or message grammars are required.
It acts as a client and replays variations of the original sequence of
messages sent to the server and retains those variations that were effective
at increasing the coverage of the code or state space. To identify the server
states that are exercised by a message sequence, AFLNet uses the server’s
response codes. From this feedback, AFLNet identifies progressive regions in
the state space, and systematically steers towards such regions.

Fedora Account System Username: pemensik

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-10 01:42:43 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6737575
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253792-aflnet/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06737575-aflnet/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Package has .a files: aflnet. Illegal package name: aflnet. Does not provide -static: aflnet.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Benson Muite 2024-11-07 02:42:53 UTC

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-11-07 02:45:03 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8224610
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253792-aflnet/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08224610-aflnet/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Benson Muite 2024-11-07 02:54:57 UTC

Buil;d fails due to changed flags. Perhaps apply a patch?

May also want to compile llvm mode.

The tests are run during build process, may want to modify
the makefile so they can be run separately in a %check section.

Comment 5 Petr Menšík 2024-12-03 17:40:16 UTC

ping to self. Needs build fixing.

Comment 6 Package Review 2025-01-03 00:45:29 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.