Bug 2255035

Summary: [RHCS 5.2][The command `ceph mds metadata` doesn't list information for the active MDS server]
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell>
Component: CephFSAssignee: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.2CC: ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ngangadh, rmandyam, tserlin, vshankar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 5.3z6   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.10-224.el8cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Add MDS metadata with FSMap changes in batches Previously, monitors would lose track of MDS metadata during upgrade and canceled PAXOS transactions, causing the MDS metadata to be unavailable. With this fix, you can add MDS metadata with FSMap changes in batches to ensure consistency. The `ceph mds metadata` command functions as expected across upgrades.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-02-08 16:57:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2258797    

Description Patrick Donnelly 2023-12-18 17:05:33 UTC
This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2255033

I am copying this bug because: 

RHCS 5 backport

This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2144472

I am copying this bug because: 

RHCS 6 backport

Description of problem:

The command `ceph mds metadata` doesn't list information for the active MDS server

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2024-02-08 16:57:17 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 Security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0745