Bug 2255232
| Summary: | rook-ceph-rgw-ocs-storagecluster-cephobjectstore warning when deployed on control-plan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Ramon Gordillo <ramon.gordillo> |
| Component: | ocs-operator | Assignee: | Jiffin <jthottan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Parikshith <pbyregow> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.14 | CC: | brgardne, etamir, jansingh, jthottan, mparida, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, srai, tnielsen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | ODF 4.15.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.15.0-123 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-03-19 15:25:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ramon Gordillo
2023-12-19 12:31:55 UTC
oc get events -n openshift-storage |grep -i TopologyAwareHintsDisabled 4m14s Warning TopologyAwareHintsDisabled service/rook-ceph-rgw-ocs-storagecluster-cephobjectstore Insufficient Node information: allocatable CPU or zone not specified on one or more nodes, addressType: IPv4 ClusterID: edf2e1a1-aa36-4464-ba23-b83e29cb4aef ClusterVersion: Stable at "4.14.6" ClusterOperators: All healthy and stable The only thing here I see we can do is add annotation`service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode: auto` to the service. Is this what you are suggesting? Hi. Yes. The rook-ceph-rgw-ocs-storagecluster-cephobjectstore service is using "service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode: Auto" annotation. That forces to use the TAH, which in the documentation says it cannot be provided in master/control-planes. Please, review the reasons and provide an alternative for this use case. Thanks. Hi Jiffin, Are we planning to revert the change as Blaine suggested or do we need to move it out to 4.16 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383 |