Bug 225685

Summary: Merge Review: device-mapper
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: lvm-team, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-09 15:24:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 426387    
Description Flags
Mock rawhide build failure none

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 17:57:25 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: device-mapper

Initial Owner: lvm-team@redhat.com

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-01-24 18:32:30 UTC
rpmlint on srpm totally clean.

rpmlint on rpms:

No docs in -devel or -libs. If there are docs that can be split into these as
appropriate, do so.  If not, ignore.

License tag should be changed to LGPLv2 on -devel and -libs packages.

This version does not have a tarball in the upstream site, nor does the Source
tag include a URL.  Might want to mention that the tarball might be in /old on
upstream's FTP if the package is not the current version, which as of this
writing it isn't.

Also, are the static libraries required by other packages?  If not, consider
removal.  Is so, consider moving them to a -static package.

mock rawhide build failed, will attach build.log.

Other than that, no blockers.

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-01-24 18:34:07 UTC
Created attachment 292836 [details]
Mock rawhide build failure

Comment 3 Alasdair Kergon 2008-01-24 18:56:46 UTC
device-mapper in rawhide is now a subpackage of LVM2, built from the lvm2 SRPM.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-01-24 19:11:03 UTC
Making this merge review a non-issue as it'll be dead.packaged?

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-05-16 15:04:25 UTC
Any updates?

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-09-09 15:24:29 UTC
Dead package, closing.