Bug 225732
| Summary: | Merge Review: epiphany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | caillon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mclasen:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-02-07 00:50:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 18:33:36 UTC
rpmlint output:
[mclasen@localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-
epiphany-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany-debuginfo-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany-devel-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
[mclasen@localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-fonts.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-lockdown.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-pango.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany.schemas
This is common practise, waived
epiphany.i386: W: invalid-license GFDL+
This should be GFDL, I think
[mclasen@localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-devel-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
epiphany-devel.i386: W: invalid-license GFDL+
Ditto
package name: ok
spec name: ok
packaging guidelines:
- description should be capitalized
- mixture of rm and %{__rm}
- -devel should require gtk-doc and pygtk2-devel for directory ownership
license: ok
license field: see above
license file: ok
spec file language: ok
spec file readable: yes
upstream sources: ok
buildable: yes
excludearch: n/a
buildrequires: ok
locale handling: ok
shared libs: n/a
relocatable: n/a
directory ownership: see above
%files: ok
permissions: ok
%clean: ok
consistent macro use: see above
permissible content: ok
large docs: n/a
%doc content: ok
headers: ok
static libs: n/a
pc files: ok
shared libs: n/a
devel package: ok
libtool archives: ok
gui app: ok
directory ownership: see above
%install: ok
utf8 filenames: ok
I've done the remaining cosmetic chances, so the package is ready for approval, methinks. Approved. |