Bug 225903

rpmlint output on SRPM and RPM

W: iproute invalid-license GPL
The value of the License tag was not recognized.  Known values are:
"Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0",
"ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified",
"BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL",
"Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL
2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or
Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+",
"IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer",
"LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff",
"LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1",
"MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL
1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL",
"Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby",
"Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C",
"WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0",
"ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-
BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL",
"Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely
redistributable without restriction".

W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg
The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all
older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing.  This may cause update
problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it
was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if
possible.

W: iproute mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 44)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

I: iproute checking
W: iproute file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man8/ss.8.gz
The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8.  Consider converting it
in the specfile for example using iconv(1).

W: iproute obsolete-not-provided shapecfg
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause
unnecessary dependency breakage.  If the obsoleting package is not a compatible
replacement for the old one, leave out the provides.

E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.


correct above and update SPEC in CVS for further review.

W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg
I think obsoletes is only warning. 

E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
Movin 

(In reply to comment #2)
> W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg
> I think obsoletes is only warning. 
> 
> E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
> Movin 

???
what is that?

Hello,
once again, the last message from rpmlint is: E: iproute nly-non-binary-in-usr-lib
but I can't fix it without upstream. I ask them about it.

But are other things got updated in SPEC file?

Yes, the spec file was updatet therefore no other problems than this one (#4) is
occuring.

thanks

1)any reason to use (pre) with BuildRequires?
2)Use macro usage. It is not consistent.
   check more at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros

Created attachment 193321 [details]
update SPEC

You may like to test attached SPEC as it may solve rpmlint error.
Just a suggestion.
Can you check functionality of your package it this solves problem?

I made the final changes in spec file. I added smp flags and use macros.

#9 I don't want do these changes. It's upstream thing.

(In reply to comment #10)
> I made the final changes in spec file. I added smp flags and use macros.
> 
> #9 I don't want do these changes. It's upstream thing.
 And why you would like to see non binary files being installed in /usr/lib.
 I checked F-7 version and saw that in that version we have q_netem.so file and
its valid to have that being installed in /usr/lib. But now I saw its no longer
part of new devel version, thus no use to have other files installed at location
/usr/lib/tc 

ping?

q_netem.so isn't used any more but option netem is supported. The distribution
in usr/lib is used by this function.

Ok, I'll fix the paths (/usr/lib), have you see any other problems with review?

I don't think so. So I need final updates to finish this review.

The path is fixed in the latest build iproute-2.6.22-4.fc9

In build.log I saw following message
warning: File listed twice: /sbin/cbq

Remove following line from %files
/sbin/cbq

Fixed, any other issues? I don't want rebuild it again and again.

(In reply to comment #18)
> Fixed, any other issues? I don't want rebuild it again and again.
thanks. No issues.

That's why I have started asking maintainers of packages from other
Merge-reviews to submit updates to some other website and that prevents
maintainers building again and again for small issues.

oops sorry but what you fixed for comment #18?
I didn't see any change in SPEC for issue reported in comment #17

Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
20ef2767896a0f156b6fbabd47936f79  iproute2-2.6.22-070710.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
- duplicates in %files present as can be seen in build.log
  warning: File listed twice: /sbin/cbq
==> This can be solved at next build time of this package
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Package iproute-2.6.22-4.fc8 ->
  Provides: config(iproute) = 2.6.22-4.fc8
  Requires: /bin/bash config(iproute) = 2.6.22-4.fc8 libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libdb-4.6.so libdl.so.2
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libresolv.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Not a GUI app.
APPROVED.