Bug 2259056

Summary:	rocthrust-devel installs /usr/include/thrust in conflict with cuda-cccl-devel package from fedora-nvidia repo
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	ed leaver <ewleaver>
Component:	rocthrust	Assignee:	Tom Rix <trix>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	39	CC:	alexjnewt, negativo17, rocm-packagers-sig, trix
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	other
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-01-22 09:45:51 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ed leaver 2024-01-18 22:58:46 UTC

Description of problem: dnf install rocthrust-devel fails if cuda-cccl-devel package is already installed from fedora-nvidia repository.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):N/A


How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. enable fedora-nvidia repository from negativo17.org
2. dnf install cuda-cccl-devel
3. dnf install rocthrust

Actual results:
Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/include/thrust/addressof.h from install of rocthrust-devel-5.7.1 1.fc39.noarch conflicts with file from package cuda-cccl-devel-1:12.3.101-1.fc39.x86_64
etc. etc. etc.

Expected results:
Transaction test success

Additional info:
fedora-nvidia is a repository developed by Simone Caronni: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Slaanesh
who among other things maintains nvidia driver and cuda libraries for RHEL, CentOS Stream, and Fedora. From my own experience they work very very well. As far as I know, /usr/include/thrust is his only /usr/include entry that lacks a "cuda" prefix. I've notified Slaanesh of this package conflict at https://negativo17.org/nvidia-proprietary-and-open-source-kernel-modules/#comment-55856. One hopes a bit of communication will resolve this issue in a mutually compatible fashion, without reference to Intel's oneAPI organization.

Comment 1 Simone Caronni 2024-01-22 09:45:51 UTC

Thanks for reporting, but my package is not official, so I will change it, moving the headers under /usr/include/cuda.

I don't think there's the need for this bug. I've reopened it here: https://github.com/negativo17/cuda-cccl/issues/2

Feel free to subscribe to it.

Comment 2 ed leaver 2024-01-23 23:06:37 UTC

I've verified this issue was resolved with fedora-nvidia's cuda-cccl-12.3.101-2.fc39.src.rpm package earlier today, which moved it's /usr/include/thrust to /usr/include/cuda/thrust. Looks good, thanks Simone!