Bug 225926

Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-digester
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, mat.booth, mwringe
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-11 20:12:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:09:10 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-digester

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-digester/
Initial Owner: mwringe

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-16 08:26:15 UTC
Mat,
Do you plan to rename it to apache commons or I should review that?

Comment 2 Matt Wringe 2010-01-18 14:33:23 UTC
This task is more than a few years old, I am no longer working on it. This bug currently doesn't have an owner.

I am not sure if the naming convention for this should be changed from jakarta-commons to apache-commons (it was following what jpackage was naming things).

Comment 3 Mat Booth 2010-01-18 14:48:46 UTC
Hi Matt,

Alex might have been talking to me...

We'd might as well wait until a package rename review request is posted, this merge review has waited this long so far, I don't think waiting a short while longer will make any difference.

Comment 4 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-18 14:51:57 UTC
Yes, I was asking Mat (the current maintainer).

Comment 5 Mat Booth 2010-05-11 20:12:05 UTC
Package rename review has been posted: bug #591298

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 591298 ***

Comment 6 Mat Booth 2010-05-11 20:28:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 591305 ***