Bug 2259664

Summary:	Static name for cephfs and RBD CSI driver deployed by ocs-client-operator
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna>
Component:	ocs-client-operator	Assignee:	Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Neha Berry <nberry>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.15	CC:	ebenahar, lgangava, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, omitrani
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	ODF 4.15.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	isf-provider
Fixed In Version:	4.15.0-126	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2259667 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-03-19 15:31:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2259667

Description Madhu Rajanna 2024-01-22 15:27:23 UTC

As of today if a cephcsi driver is deployed by ocs-client-operator in any namespace (example openshift-client) it gets a name that contains the prefix as the namespace name and it will be named as openshift-client.rbd.csi.ceph.com and openshift-client-cephfs.csi.ceph.com but this is not static and can cause the problem in choosing the right storage profile for CNV as CNV always expects static driver names irrespective of the namespace where the client is deployed.

This BZ is to make the csi driver name consistent irrespective of the namespace where it is deployed and the driver name should be openshift-storage.rbd.csi.ceph.com and openshift-storage.cephfs.csi.ceph.com

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2024-03-19 15:31:57 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383