Bug 226082

Summary: Merge Review: libXp
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: sandmann
Target Milestone: ---Flags: panemade: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libXp-1.0.0-10.fc9 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-15 05:06:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:32:07 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: libXp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXp/
Initial Owner: sandmann

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-01-15 05:06:01 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
+ rpmlint output is ok to accept 
libXp.src:63: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS
-I$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}"
as this is side effect of patch 
+ source match upstream
0f4ac39108c1ae8c443cdfac259b58fa  libXp-1.0.0.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are used correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains contents.
+ no static libraries.
+ xp.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ ldconfig scriptlets are used.
+ Not a GUI app.

APPROVED.