Bug 226135

Hi Warren,

Review for release 4.1:
* RPM name is OK
* Source memtest86+-1.65.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* Builds fine in mock
* File list looks OK

Needs work:
* BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot)
* Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
  (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)
* The package should contain the text of the license
  (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)


Notes:
* Please use {?dist} in Release tag
* Is the Obsoletes: memtest86 still necessary?

Rpmlint is not silent:

Source RPM:
W: memtest86+ strange-permission new-memtest-pkg 0775
W: memtest86+ strange-permission memtest-setup 0775
W: memtest86+ unversioned-explicit-obsoletes memtest86
W: memtest86+ macro-in-%changelog version

rpmlint of memtest86+:
E: memtest86+ obsolete-not-provided memtest86
E: memtest86+ no-binary
W: memtest86+ wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/memtest86+-1.65/README

> Needs work:
> * BuildRoot should be
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot)

OK

> * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
>   (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)

OK, comment indicates that it isn't necessary.

> * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
>  (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)

Nothing remaining has a standardized macro available.

> * The package should contain the text of the license
>  (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)

- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.

(does not apply)

>Notes:
>* Please use {?dist} in Release tag
DONE
>* Is the Obsoletes: memtest86 still necessary?
Not really, removed

> rpmlint of memtest86+:
>E: memtest86+ no-binary
rpmlint is just confused by this strange package.
> W: memtest86+ wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/memtest86+-1.65/README
What?!

(Assigning back to reviewer)

> Nothing remaining has a standardized macro available.

Only the /usr/include in BuildRequires

> /usr/share/doc/memtest86+-1.65/README
> What?!

[ruben@odin memtest86+-1.65]$ file README
README: ASCII English text, with CRLF line terminators

[ruben@odin memtest86+-1.65]$ hexdump -C README | tail -3
000089b0  6d 74 65 73 74 38 36 2b  20 76 31 2e 31 31 29 2e  |mtest86+ v1.11).|
000089c0  0d 0a                                             |..|
000089c2

0d 0a, that's CRLF on the last line. Nevermind, this is nitpicking

This package is APPROVED.

Ah thanks.  I fixed the includedir macro.

I assume the reason for not having it available at boot on F7 test 3 is that
this package is still undergoing review.

No.  Merge Review is only a qualify improvement sweep.  You can install
memtest86+ after install, or you can use it from the initial menu when booting
the installer.

In F7 test 3 you need to press ESC then ENTER to get to the boot promt 
(no cursor)then either F1 - F5 to get the various text help screens and on
typing the usual memtest86 you get could not find kernel image: memtest86