Bug 226159

Does this still need a new owner, if so can I take it on and if so how do I go
about getting sponsored, etc(In reply to comment #0)

Taking review.

rpmlint output:
mozplugger.src:14: E: buildprereq-use libX11-devel
mozplugger.src:15: E: buildprereq-use libXt-devel
mozplugger.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes plugger
mozplugger.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mozplugger-1.10.1/README
mozplugger.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided plugger
mozplugger.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mozpluggerrc
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/include/npupp.h
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/include/npapi.h
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/include/jri_md.h
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/include/jritypes.h
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/include/jri.h
mozplugger-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mozplugger-1.10.1/npapi/common/npunix.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings.

- Fix the above (to fix debuginfo errors you need to remove executable perms of the source code files in the setup phase)

- Consider updating buildroot to
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

- Source URL is incorrect, also version is quite old (newest is 1.12.0, released in November).
http://mozplugger.mozdev.org/files/mozplugger-1.12.0.tar.gz

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX
 - Matches upstream source but source url incorrect as stated above.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX
 - %{_libdir}/mozilla is provided by mozilla-filesystem on F10; this package probably shouldn't provide the dir, just the plugin file instead.

MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

Ping.

ping than

ping again?

>rpmlint output:
>mozplugger.src:14: E: buildprereq-use libX11-devel
>mozplugger.src:15: E: buildprereq-use libXt-devel
What is problem here? Both BuildRequires are required!

the rest is fixed in 1.12.1-6. Sorry for delayed respond

BuildPreReqs are not used, use BuildRequires instead. But I see you had already changed that in the past 5 months, so that's OK.

**

The patches don't have comments, please add them.

**

The Obsoletes: plugger can probably be removed, since this package is 6 years old and we only support upgrades from F(N-1) -> F(N). That takes care of

mozplugger.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes plugger
mozplugger.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided plugger

**

Did you fix the permissions on the header files as well? I suggest simply using
 find . \( -name *.h -o -name *.c \) -exec chmod 644 {} \;
to get them all fixed.

>The patches don't have comments, please add them.
it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12

>The Obsoletes: plugger can probably be removed, since this package is 6 years
>old and we only support upgrades from F(N-1) -> F(N). That takes care of
it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12

>Did you fix the permissions on the header files as well? I suggest simply >using find . \( -name *.h -o -name *.c \) -exec chmod 644 {} \;
>to get them all fixed. 

it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12

I still get
mozplugger.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mozpluggerrc
mozplugger.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mozplugger-1.12.1/README
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fix at least the latter warning. Otherwise, this package has been

APPROVED

>I still get
>mozplugger.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mozpluggerrc
>mozplugger.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mozplugger-1.12.1/README

it's fixed now in CVS

I think we may close this ticket, since all issues were addressed.