Bug 2262052

Summary:	default multisite zonegroup creation should contain realm
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Parth Arora <paarora>
Component:	rook	Assignee:	Parth Arora <paarora>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Shivam Durgbuns <sdurgbun>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.15	CC:	ebenahar, muagarwa, nberry, odf-bz-bot, tnielsen
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	ODF 4.15.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	4.15.0-141	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-03-19 15:32:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Parth Arora 2024-01-31 06:01:05 UTC

Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

default multisite zonegroup creation should contain realm,
2024-01-30 20:21:53.822971 E | ceph-object-controller: failed to reconcile CephObjectStore "object-ns/other-tls-test-store". failed to create object store deployments: failed to configure multisite for object store: failed create ceph multisite for object-store ["other-tls-test-store"]: failed to create ceph ["zone" "--rgw-zone=other-tls-test-store" "unable to initialize zonegroup other-tls-test-store: (2) No such file or directory. "] %!!(MISSING)q(MISSING), for reason %!!(MISSING)q(MISSING): exit status 2


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Parth Arora 2024-01-31 06:02:42 UTC

Fix upstream: https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/13655

Comment 3 Travis Nielsen 2024-01-31 16:48:21 UTC

This is needed for 4.15 as was discovered when backporting the related change to 4.14 with BZ 2254547, see [1].

Neha, could we get a QE ack?

[1] https://github.com/red-hat-storage/rook/pull/559

Comment 4 Elad 2024-02-06 13:17:03 UTC

Hi Parth, would you be able to provide the steps for verifying the fix?

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2024-03-19 15:32:27 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-07-18 04:25:32 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days