Bug 226252

Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ppisar, robin.norwood
Target Milestone: ---Flags: panemade: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-12 10:35:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:34:55 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-DBD-Pg/
Initial Owner: rnorwood

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-22 10:59:17 UTC
1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully.
   remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1
2)you may like to use simple disttag as "5%{?dist}" only


Comment 2 Robin Norwood 2007-10-25 03:40:22 UTC
1) fixed.
2) Fixed - I, too, hate dots after the %{?dist} tag.  I blame spot.

I also fixed the BR: perl-DBI > 1.38 to be BR: perl(DBI) > 1.38 and changed
Patch: to be Patch0:

New version is: perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-6.fc9

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-25 04:31:47 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
76b9d6a2f4cbaefcba23380f83998215  DBD-Pg-1.49.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-6.fc8 ->
  Provides: Pg.so perl(DBD::Pg) = 1.49 perl(DBD::Pg::DefaultValue)
perl(DBD::Pg::db) perl(DBD::Pg::dr) perl(DBD::Pg::st)
  Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpq.so.5
perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DBI) perl(DBI) >= 1.38
perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH)

APPROVED.


Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-11-11 07:04:12 UTC
Can we CLOSE this review if package is already built and in rawhide?

Comment 5 Petr Pisar 2012-03-13 14:19:40 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-DBD-Pg
Branches: f15 f16 f17
Owners: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

Please add perl-sig user with watch* permissions only to all Fedora branches.

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-03-13 14:39:43 UTC
Done.