Bug 226269

Summary: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: robin.norwood
Target Milestone: ---Flags: panemade: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-12 10:36:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:36:40 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-libxml-perl/
Initial Owner: rnorwood

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-26 11:17:48 UTC
1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully.
   remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1
2)drop "|| :" from %check
3)you may like to add disttag
4)rpmlint only complained ->
perl-libxml-perl.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Data::Grove)
This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it
once.

perl-libxml-perl.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.


Comment 2 Robin Norwood 2007-10-26 18:28:02 UTC
All of the above should be fixed in the latest version: perl-libxml-perl-0.08-3.fc9

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-27 02:09:38 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
0ed5fbdda53d1301ddaed88db10503bb  libxml-perl-0.08.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test outputs
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/amsterdam...........ok
t/canon_xml_writer....ok
t/schema..............ok
t/stream..............ok
t/subs................ok
t/xp_sax..............ok
All tests successful.
Files=6, Tests=45,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.28 cusr +  0.07 csys =  0.35 CPU)
+ Package perl-libxml-perl-0.08-3.fc8 ->
Provides: perl(Data::Grove::Characters) perl(Data::Grove::Parent) = 0.08
perl(Data::Grove::ParentList) perl(Data::Grove::Visitor) = 0.08
perl(XML::ESISParser) = 0.08 perl(XML::Handler::CanonXMLWriter) = 0.08
perl(XML::Handler::Sample) perl(XML::Handler::Subs) = 0.08
perl(XML::Handler::XMLWriter) = 0.08 perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) = 0.08
perl(XML::PatAct::ACTION) perl(XML::PatAct::Amsterdam) = 0.08
perl(XML::PatAct::MatchName) = 0.08 perl(XML::PatAct::PATTERN)
perl(XML::PatAct::ToObjects) = 0.08 perl(XML::Perl2SAX) = 0.08
perl(XML::SAX2Perl) = 0.08
Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File)
perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(XML::Handler::Subs) perl(XML::Parser) perl(strict) perl(vars)


 APPROVED.


Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-11-11 07:04:14 UTC
Can we CLOSE this review if package is already built and in rawhide?