Bug 226281

Summary: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: david.hannequin, ppisar, robin.norwood
Target Milestone: ---Flags: panemade: fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-12 10:38:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:38:08 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-TermReadKey/
Initial Owner: rnorwood

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-20 12:42:33 UTC
1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully.
   remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1
2)drop "|| :" from %check
3)rpmlint only complained ->
perl-TermReadKey.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.


Comment 2 Robin Norwood 2007-10-25 04:23:32 UTC
all issues above fixed.
Also added %{?dist} tag to release
New version is 2.30-3.fc9

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-25 05:39:47 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
f0ef2cea8acfbcc58d865c05b0c7e1ff  TermReadKey-2.30.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test outputs
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" -w test.pl
1 .. 8
ok 1
ok 2  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 3  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 4  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 5  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 6  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 7  # skip /dev/tty is absent
ok 8  # skip /dev/tty is absent
+ Package perl-TermReadKey-2.30-3.fc8 ->
 Provides: ReadKey.so perl(Term::ReadKey) = 2.30
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) rtld(GNU_HASH)

APPROVED.


Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-11-11 07:04:16 UTC
Can we CLOSE this review if package is already built and in rawhide?

Comment 5 Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 09:16:16 UTC
*** Bug 516249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-13 07:22:20 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-TermReadKey
InitialCC: perl-sig

Please add into CC perl-sig.

Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-13 17:24:16 UTC
Please don't include a change request if you're not going to include a proper one; it just confuses the scripts.  Simply raising the flag and describing what you need done should be sufficient.

I added perl-sig to all of the Fedora branches.

Comment 8 Petr Pisar 2012-08-21 11:20:21 UTC
Current package declares license `Copyright only'. However sources contains ppport.h which is `Artistic or GPL+' and which results into distributed shared library. Thus the package should declare `Artistic or GPL+'. I will fix it.