Bug 226298
Summary: | Merge Review: pirut | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bkearney, katzj |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jima:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-11 01:07:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 20:40:34 UTC
Starting review... OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: a8f5de528d0491ccbaed671063200521 pirut-1.2.10.tar.gz OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. See below - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 62 bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. 1. Ha ha ha No upstream site, no MD5SUM to authenticate against, no place to check we have the latest version. We should probably do something about that. :-) 2. The recommended BuildRoot is: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 3. rpmlint says: on pirut-1.2.10-1.fc7.noarch.rpm: E: pirut obsolete-not-provided system-config-packages E: pirut obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-packages E: pirut obsolete-not-provided pup E: pirut obsolete-not-provided up2date-gnome E: pirut obsolete-not-provided rhn-applet on pirut-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm: W: pirut unversioned-explicit-obsoletes system-config-packages W: pirut unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-packages W: pirut unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pup W: pirut unversioned-explicit-obsoletes up2date-gnome W: pirut unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhn-applet These are a bit concerning, but based on our discussion on IRC, I have to agree that they're probably a necessary evil. All of these packages provided, at one time or another, the same functionality that pirut does. They're all long gone from Fedora, probably never to come back. I'd suggest adding Provides for the Obsoleted packages, and perhaps versioning the Obsoletes, but I honestly can't say what the long-term side effects to that might be. Ergo, I imagine we need to just go with what we've got. (Besides, it's already in Core.) 4. I'm a bit concerned about pirut's use of /etc/xdg/autostart/ -- it's owned by gnome-session, but I'm not seeing any sort of dependency on gnome-session. This might be a problem. 5. Open bugs. Holy carp! 62 open bugs! Address #2, #4, and maybe #5 and I think we may have a deal. (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Ha ha ha > No upstream site, no MD5SUM to authenticate against, no place to check > we have the latest version. We should probably do something about that. > :-) Someday maybe... right now, no one else has even expressed interest in using it, so it's not worth the overhead of having a site, etc. The authoritative source is the src.rpm > 2. The recommended BuildRoot is: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) jbowes fixed this up for 1.2.11 > 3. rpmlint says: [snip] > These are a bit concerning, but based on our discussion on IRC, I have > to agree that they're probably a necessary evil. All of these packages > provided, at one time or another, the same functionality that pirut > does. They're all long gone from Fedora, probably never to come back. > I'd suggest adding Provides for the Obsoleted packages, and perhaps > versioning the Obsoletes, but I honestly can't say what the long-term > side effects to that might be. Ergo, I imagine we need to just go with > what we've got. (Besides, it's already in Core.) Yeah, necessary evil of having legacy. The obsoletes are for the upgrade path only, not for people wanting to require a specific type of functionality. > 4. I'm a bit concerned about pirut's use of /etc/xdg/autostart/ -- it's > owned by gnome-session, but I'm not seeing any sort of dependency on > gnome-session. This might be a problem. jbowes fixed this up too > 5. Open bugs. Holy carp! 62 open bugs! I expected it was over 100 at this point ;-) Big triage to come hopefully the end of this week. Trying to get a few other things in shape prior to the feature freeze, though, so it remains to be seen. Like I said, #1 and #3 weren't deal-breakers. #1 is a maybe-if-the-need-arises thing, #3 will sort itself out with time, as I understand it. You fixed my big two issues with the package, so as long as you work on those bugs, I think we can call pirut APPROVED for merging. As this is approved, I'm closing it. |