Bug 226360

NEEDS work
  rpmlint said
W: readahead invalid-license GPL
The value of the License tag was not recognized.  Known values are:
"Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0",
"ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified",
"BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL",
"Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL
2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or
Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+",
"IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer",
"LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff",
"LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1",
"MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL
1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL",
"Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby",
"Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C",
"WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0",
"ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-
BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL",
"Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely
redistributable without restriction".

W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.early
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag.
A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:

%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here


W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.later
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag.
A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:

%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here


W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later
The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security
reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the
init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword
to fix this if appropriate for this service.

W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early
The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security
reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the
init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword
to fix this if appropriate for this service.

ping?
Can you update SPEC for further review?

Sorry, I was busy with some other stuff.

> W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.early
> W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.later

Hmm... I'd like to keep these files updateable

> W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later
> W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early

The "default-enabled" is expected behaviour.

The problem with license is fixed in the latest package build
(readahead-1.4.2-1.fc8).

thanks for build.
Still I see some more cleanups needed here.
1) Check initscript scriptlets given at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-97754e2c646616c5f6222f0cfc6923c60765133e

 Can you please explain using triggerpostun instead postun?

2) %files section should be like this
%files -f %{name}.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,- )
%doc COPYING README lists/README.lists
%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/readahead.cron
%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later
%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.conf
%dir                                       %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d
%{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d/default.early
%{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d/default.later
%{_sbindir}/readahead
/sbin/readahead-collector

(In reply to comment #4)
>  Can you please explain using triggerpostun instead postun?

No :-) It's legacy from old versions. I think we needn't this trigger. So...
removed.

> 2) %files section should be like this

Thanks! See & Try: readahead-1.4.2-2.fc8.

Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM.
  readahead.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/readahead.d/default.early
  readahead.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/readahead.d/default.later
  readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later
  readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later
  readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early
  readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early
  These can be ignored for this package.
+ source files match upstream.
b1b087681c06b66a4e4c7e944336db  readahead-1.4.2.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are honoured correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ package  readahead-1.4.2-2.fc8 ->
  Provides: config(readahead) = 1:1.4.2-2.fc8
  Requires: /bin/bash /bin/gawk /bin/sh config(readahead) = 1:1.4.2-2.fc8
libaudit.so.0 libauparse.so.0 libblkid.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libext2fs.so.2
procps rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Not a GUI app.

APPROVED.

oops forgot to edit review template.
* initscripts scriptlets are used in this package.