Bug 226414

Summary: Merge Review: sg3_utils
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Denis Leroy <denis>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: pknirsch
Target Milestone: ---Flags: denis: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-28 10:23:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:58:45 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: sg3_utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sg3_utils/
Initial Owner: pknirsch

Comment 1 Denis Leroy 2008-03-10 11:39:20 UTC
sg3_utils needs some love. Spec is not fedora compliant (static libs, .la libs).
It also could use an update to 1.25 which uses automake and will make the spec
file simpler. 1.25 also introduces the very useful 'sg_raw' utility.



Comment 2 Phil Knirsch 2008-03-20 19:01:41 UTC
Will take care of it next week.

Read ya, Phil

Comment 3 Phil Knirsch 2008-03-27 14:30:09 UTC
Ok, did some final cleanups to the specfile and removed the static libraries.
The remaining rpmlint warnings are either not fixable or plainly wrong for this
package (libs package doesn't contain any documentation and sg3_utils-devel only
needs the sg3_utils-libs package to work properly).

Building sg3_utils-1.25-3 in rawhide as i write this, so should land in the next
couple of days in the tree.

Let me know if there is anything else you see that should be changed.

Thanks,

Read ya, Phil

Comment 4 Denis Leroy 2008-03-28 10:21:25 UTC
Looking good. couple of minor non-blocking nitpicks

- is the "Provides: sg_utils' still useful ?

- instead of removing the *.a files, simply configure with '--disable-static'
(you still need to keep the removal of *.la files though).

This review is APPROVED.


Comment 5 Phil Knirsch 2008-03-28 14:07:02 UTC
I just figured i'd keep the Provides in, but i checked today once more and we
never actually shipped sg_utils in Fedora or Red Hat, so i'll just drop it.

And good point about the 2nd thing, will add that in the new build as well.

Thanks Denis!

Read ya, Phil