Bug 226477 (tanukiwrapper)

Summary: Merge Review: tanukiwrapper
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jesusr, msuchy, panemade, viveklak
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-20 14:43:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 21:08:18 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: tanukiwrapper

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tanukiwrapper/
Initial Owner: vivekl

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 22:40:52 UTC
*** Bug 434880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-09-17 10:00:45 UTC
I can see this package is dead now.

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-15 05:04:17 UTC
I would like to maintain this package.

Due Fedora policy on retired packages in need to go through review again:
SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper.spec
SRC.RPM:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-5.fc12.src.rpm

This is the version of tanukiwrapper which already has been in Fedora (last update on July 2010). No changes from me.

I wanted to package latest version of Tanukiwrapper, but it change license, which is non-free:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00253.html
This is most probably non-intentional change and upstream may be willing to release it under some free license, so I contact them If they are willing to do some change toward free license.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-15 14:50:50 UTC
So what is there to merge review?  The package is not currently in the distribution; there's no point in having an open merge review ticket for it.

Can you close this and open a proper review ticket when you have something that could be reviewed (i.e. actually has a free software license)?

Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-20 14:43:38 UTC
I thought that merge/package reviewes are in the end the same. And I hesitated to open new BZ. OK, I will open new one.