Bug 2265415
| Summary: | [GSS] MDS crashes after upgrade to RHCS 6.1z4 - "assert_condition": "lock->get_state() == LOCK_LOCK || lock->get_state() == LOCK_MIX || lock->get_state() == LOCK_MIX_SYNC2" | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Manny <mcaldeir> | |
| Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Xiubo Li <xiubli> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji> | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Akash Raj <akraj> | |
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | akraj, bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, hyelloji, mcaldeir, nravinas, rsachere, tserlin, vereddy, vshankar, xiubli | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | 7.1 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-18.2.1-83.el9cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
.ceph-mds no longer crashes when some inodes are replicated in multi-mds cluster
Previously, due to incorrect lock assertion in ceph-mds, ceph-mds would crash when some inodes were replicated in a multi-mds cluster.
With this fix, the lock state in the assertion is validated and no crash is observed.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2265504 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-06-13 14:27:15 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2265504, 2265505, 2267614, 2298578, 2298579 | |||
|
Comment 5
Manny
2024-02-22 18:37:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Critical: Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security, enhancements, and bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3925 |