Bug 226550

Just some comments...

- X-CD-Roast 0.98alpha16 released
  http://www.xcdroast.org/#download
- Summary ends with a dot
- Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)
- Use parallel make (make %{?_smp_mflags})
- Package doesn't consistently use macros
- Please add a note because 'PREFIX=/usr' is used
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages

Roman Rakus is the owner acc. to the PackageDB. Added as cc.

xcdroast-0.98-0.1.alpha16.fc11 built. Now it should be ok.

rpmlint output:
xcdroast.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}
xcdroast.src:104: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/bin
xcdroast.src:105: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/icons
xcdroast.src:106: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/sound
xcdroast.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/*/*
xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/TRANSLATION.HOWTO
xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/ChangeLog
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings.

Created attachment 381208 [details]
Suggested patch

After application of patch, rpmlint is clean.

When you apply the patch, be sure to modify the desktop file for the new location of the icon.


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK
- After application of patch.
- The patch lines that have been commented out should be removed completely.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK
- The files in src/ don't have any license statements.
- The GPLv2 COPYING is attached => assumed license is GPL+.
- Files in intl/ are under LGPLv2+.
=> License field should be "GPL+ and LGPLv2+", or the resulting "GPLv2+".

Please ask upstream to clarify license and add license headers to all source code files.


MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK
- Source URL bad, patch fixes it.
- Source matches upstream.

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK
- At least after application of patch.

MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
- After application of patch.

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
- After application of patch.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK


Apply the patch and fix the license tag, then I'll approve the review.

I have changed spec file (commited), but I rather wait for an answer from the upstream about the license.

All should be corrected in xcdroast-0.98-0.4.alpha16.fc14.

Source URL is still incorrect. Otherwise looks good.

APPROVED

Feel free to close once you have fixed the source URL as per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL

Thanks. Corrected in xcdroast-0.98-0.5.alpha16.fc14