Bug 226555

Updated Files here:
https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/352/xerces-j2.spec
https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/351/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm

Please fix item(s) mared by X:
MUST:
* package is named appropriately
 - match upstream tarball or project name
 - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for
consistency
 - specfile should be %{name}.spec
 - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or
   something)
 - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease
 - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be
   not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name
* is it legal for Fedora to distribute this?
 - OSI-approved
 - not a kernel module
 - not shareware
 - is it covered by patents?
 - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator
 - no binary firmware
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
 - use acronyms for licences where common
* specfile name matches %{name}
X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
 - Source0 doesn't exist
* skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
* correct buildroot
 - should be:
   %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and %
locations)
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
* keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old?
useless?)
* packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
X rpmlint on <this package>.srpm gives no output
W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl
The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides
* changelog should be in one of these formats:

  * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating> - 0.6-4
  - And fix the link syntax.

  * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating> 0.6-4
  - And fix the link syntax.

  * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating>
  - 0.6-4
  - And fix the link syntax.

* Packager tag should not be used
* Vendor tag should not be used
* Distribution tag should not be used
* use License and not Copyright
* Summary tag should not end in a period
* if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post)
X specfile is legible
 - please get rid of section tag
 - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project
in its own right.' , please update with the new URL
 - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of
   macros except for %{__sed}
* package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
* BuildRequires are proper
 - builds in mock will flush out problems here
 - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires:
   bash
   bzip2
   coreutils
   cpio
   diffutils
   fedora-release (and/or redhat-release)
   gcc
   gcc-c++
   gzip
   make
   patch
   perl
   redhat-rpm-config
   rpm-build
   sed
   tar
   unzip
   which
* summary should be a short and concise description of the package
* description expands upon summary (don't include installation
instructions)
* make sure lines are <= 80 characters
* specfile written in American English
* make a -doc sub-package if necessary
 - see
  
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b
* packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible
* don't use rpath
* config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace)
* GUI apps should contain .desktop files
* should the package contain a -devel sub-package?
* use macros appropriately and consistently
 - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
* don't use %makeinstall
* install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
* locale data handling correct (find_lang)
 - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the
   end of %install
X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps
- please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253
* split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines
* package should probably not be relocatable
* package contains code
 - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent
 - in general, there should be no offensive content
* package should own all directories and files
* there should be no %files duplicates
* file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present
* %clean should be present
* %doc files should not affect runtime
* if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www
* verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
jaxp_parser_impl
xerces-j2-2.7.1.jar.so()(64bit)
xerces-j2-dom3 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/usr/sbin/update-alternatives
/usr/sbin/update-alternatives
java-gcj >= 1.5.0
java-gcj >= 1.5.0
jaxp_parser_impl
jaxp_parser_impl
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
xml-commons-apis >= 0:1.3
xml-commons-resolver >= 1.1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-debuginfo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-2.7.1.jar.so.debug()(64bit)
xerces-j2-samples.jar.so.debug()(64bit)
xerces-j2-debuginfo = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-debuginfo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-samples.jar.so()(64bit)
xerces-j2-demo = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-dom3-javadoc = 0:9jpp.1.fc7-2.7.1
xerces-j2-javadoc-apis = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-javadoc-impl = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-javadoc-other = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-javadoc-xni = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
xerces-j2-scripts = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.6
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7
X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm
W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar /etc/alternatives
W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar
/etc/alternatives
- Can these symlink warnings be fixed?

W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing
W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation
- Is there any doc for the -demo package?

W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation
W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation
W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation
W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation
W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation
- Is there any doc for the -scripts package?


SHOULD:
* package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
* package should build on i386
* package should build in mock

(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> * specfile name matches %{name}
> X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
>  - Source0 doesn't exist
Updated link location

> * skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
> * correct buildroot
>  - should be:
>    %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and %
> locations)
> * license text included in package and marked with %doc
> * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old?
> useless?)
> * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
> X rpmlint on <this package>.srpm gives no output
> W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl
> The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides
Fixed


> X specfile is legible
>  - please get rid of section tag
Done

>  - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project
> in its own right.' , please update with the new URL
This is the proper URL, they are just saying welcome to the new project page
they are not part of the XML project anymore.

>  - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of
>    macros except for %{__sed}
Fixed

> X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps
> - please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253
fixed (note -a is the same as -dpR)

> X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs
> [pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm
> W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar
/etc/alternatives
> W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar
> /etc/alternatives
> - Can these symlink warnings be fixed?
No, the package needs to use the external Alternatives system, therefore the
symlinks warnings can't be removed.

> 
> W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing
> W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation
> - Is there any doc for the -demo package?
No

> W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation
> - Is there any doc for the -scripts package?
No

> 
> SHOULD:
> * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
> * package should build on i386
> * package should build in mock
> 

Updated SRPM:

https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/351/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> > * specfile name matches %{name}
> > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
> >  - Source0 doesn't exist
> Updated link location
md5sum matches
> 
> > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
> > * correct buildroot
> >  - should be:
> >    %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> > * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and %
> > locations)
> > * license text included in package and marked with %doc
> > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old?
> > useless?)
> > * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
> > X rpmlint on <this package>.srpm gives no output
> > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> > W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl
> > The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides
> Fixed
> 
> 
> > X specfile is legible
> >  - please get rid of section tag
> Done
> 
Great!
> >  - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project
> > in its own right.' , please update with the new URL
> This is the proper URL, they are just saying welcome to the new project page
> they are not part of the XML project anymore.
OK
> 
> >  - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of
> >    macros except for %{__sed}
> Fixed
> 
Great!
> > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps
> > - please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253
> fixed (note -a is the same as -dpR)
> 
Ah, OK.
> > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs
> > [pcheung@to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint
> > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm
> > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> > W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar
> /etc/alternatives
> > W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar
> > /etc/alternatives
> > - Can these symlink warnings be fixed?
> No, the package needs to use the external Alternatives system, therefore the
> symlinks warnings can't be removed.
> 
OK
> > 
> > W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing
> > W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation
> > - Is there any doc for the -demo package?
> No
OK
> 
> > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> > W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML
> > W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation
> > - Is there any doc for the -scripts package?
> No
OK
> 
> > 
> > SHOULD:
> > * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
> > * package should build on i386
> > * package should build in mock
> > 
> 
> Updated SRPM:
> 
>
https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/351/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm
> 

Looks good.

APPROVED

*** Bug 456281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***