Bug 226678
| Summary: | Update azureus.script | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> |
| Component: | azureus | Assignee: | Anthony Green <green> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-03-06 16:37:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Azureus seems to run fine in rawhide. The script already sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to /usr/lib{,64}/eclipse:/usr/lib{,64}. Isn't that enough?
If it runs, then I guess LD_LIBRARY_PATH is correct. I was once told that setting that in a wrapper script was bad, though. Will java.library.path changes work? Are they any better/worse than LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting? I don't think it makes any difference. We can reopen if we discover otherwise. |
We no longer have SWT JNI .so symlinks in /usr/lib{,64}. As such, we need to update azureus.script to have -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib (or lib64)/eclipse. This should be done in rawhide right now. F7 test1 will have a broken azureus and rssowl. Sorry for not dealing with this earlier.