Bug 2271833

Summary:	Update package in EPEL8 / possible?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Leon Fauster <leonfauster>
Component:	shell-color-prompt	Assignee:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	petersen
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	petersen: mirror+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	shell-color-prompt-0.4-1.el8	Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-08-07 01:28:23 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Leon Fauster 2024-03-27 13:29:24 UTC

Thanks for this new package in EPEL!

Description of problem:

Current version in EPEL8 is shell-color-prompt-0.1-6.el8

Is it possible to rebase it to the same version of EPEL9?
(-> shell-color-prompt-0.4-1.el9)

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2025-04-07 06:01:13 UTC

Yes, should be possible - sorry for the long delay

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2025-07-10 05:53:17 UTC

I tested a bit and it seems to work okay, so going ahead.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2025-07-10 06:22:58 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0a390ac539 (shell-color-prompt-0.4-1.el8) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0a390ac539

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-07-10 14:41:08 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0a390ac539 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0a390ac539

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-08-07 01:28:23 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0a390ac539 (shell-color-prompt-0.4-1.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.