Bug 227228
Summary: | Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Lamien <lxtnow> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | Flags: | chitlesh:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-10 01:10:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Xavier Lamien
2007-02-03 19:03:55 UTC
It's like my kshutdown :) Easy Fix: chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gshutdown-0.2-1.rc1.src.rpm W: gshutdown mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 2) You should add timestamps to your make install: %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" install version labeling: Version: 0.2 Release: 1.rc1%{?dist} you should pretty much do: Version: 0.2rc1 Release: 1%{?dist} You can dropped explicit BR: BuildRequires: gtk2-devel, libglade2-devel Since chitlesh(devel)[0]$rpm -qR libglade2-devel /usr/bin/python gtk2-devel >= 2.5.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 [...] libglade2-devel already requires gtk2-devel You can dropped this as well --add-category X-Fedora \ The file NEWS is useless, you also dropped it as its contents refers to ChangeLog Also there is no use of writing explicit requires such: Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2 yum will search for them automatically. :) And also see whether the following has some negative influence on its usuability or not: chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$gshutdown (gshutdown:27870): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_row_reference_new: assertion `GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (model)' failed (gshutdown:27870): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_cell_view_set_displayed_row: assertion `GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (cell_view->priv->model)' failed > you should pretty much do:
> Version: 0.2rc1
> Release: 1%{?dist}
Certainly not. But:
Version: 0.2
Release: 0.1.rc1%{?dist}
> Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2
Make sure these are not caught by rpmbuild automatically. Query
the binary rpms and look out for the dependencies on the library
sonames. Avoid dependencies on package names wherever possible.
you should make use of GTK+ icon cache http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : Mock has failed, you have a missing BuildRequires desktop-file-install the next time you submit a package, try to mock the package :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks typo: it's desktop-file-utils and not desktop-file-install (in reply to commnet #2) All fixed except explicit BR for libglade2-devel which required, mock failed while building whitout it. (in reply to comment #4) >Certainly not. But: > Version: 0.2 > Release: 0.1.rc1%{?dist} fixed (in reply to comment #6) added %post and %postun -------------------- New spec and srpm files rebuilt in mock SPEC URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/SPECS/gshutdown.spec SRPM URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/RPMs/gshutdown-0.2-0.2.rc1.fc6.src.rpm # 001: (In reply to comment #5) > > Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2 > > Make sure these are not caught by rpmbuild automatically. Query > the binary rpms and look out for the dependencies on the library > sonames. Avoid dependencies on package names wherever possible. > gshutdown already requires libnotify.so.1 and libglade-2.0.so.0 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXau.so.6 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libnotify.so.1 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) Remove "Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2" from the spec file. # 002 : typo in changelog you wrote "- Removed "--add-categorie" from desktop-file-install." It should be "--add-category" and not "--add-categorie" (In reply to comment #9) > (in reply to commnet #2) > > All fixed except explicit BR for libglade2-devel which required, > mock failed while building whitout it. > libglade2-devel already requires gtk2-devel i.e to install libglade2-devel, yum will fetch gtk2-devel. Hence gtk2-devel is not required as BR. ping ? Sorry for the late, Fix's coming Fixed, SPEC:http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/gshutdown.spec SRPM:http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SRPMS/gshutdown-0.2-0.3.rc1.fc7.src.rpm LOG: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/Gshutodown-0.2-build.log * Tue May 01 2007 Xavier lamien <lxtnow> - 0.2-0.3.rc1 - Fixed redundant BR and Requires. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure for the CVS Request procedure. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gshutdown Short Description: Advanced shut down utility for GNOME Owners: lxtnow Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: cvs done. Note that FC-5 branches are not valid anymore, so this branch wasn't created. Also, Note that the bugzilla sync process isn't yet caught up to the merge of core and extras components, so it might not be until tomorrow for this to have a bugzilla component. Xavier, is there any progress with the bug ? Fixed, Imported and built ;). |