Bug 2274272

Summary: Review Request: python-zstarfile - Tarfile extension with additional compression algorithms and PEP 706 by default
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Maxwell G <maxwell>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mikel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mikel: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-04-12 16:27:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2273823    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Maxwell G 2024-04-10 03:14:07 UTC
Spec URL: https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-zstarfile/python-zstarfile.spec
SRPM URL: https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-zstarfile/python-zstarfile-0.2.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
zstarfile is a tarfile extension with additional compression algorithms and
PEP 706 by default.

Comment 1 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-04-12 09:21:59 UTC
approved!

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[-]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT License". Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-
     zstarfile/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib, /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages,
     /usr/share/licenses, /usr, /usr/lib/python3.12, /usr/share/doc,
     /usr/share
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib,
     /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages, /usr/share/licenses, /usr,
     /usr/lib/python3.12, /usr/share/doc, /usr/share
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 1455 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: Sources 0, 1 and 2 are not passed to gpgverify.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-zstarfile-0.2.0-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          python-zstarfile-0.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8azsifil')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://meta.sr.ht/~gotmax23.pgp :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 65dfebf88a8d8b1d7fa0819616fa7ae6f627f6538bffc137519d1c60098dc928
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 65dfebf88a8d8b1d7fa0819616fa7ae6f627f6538bffc137519d1c60098dc928
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/zstarfile/refs/download/v0.2.0/zstarfile-0.2.0.tar.gz.asc :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 1f58b749d814b1ae3b8811ed73adb7075d3c3eece96e8196669d9e23ec38621c
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1f58b749d814b1ae3b8811ed73adb7075d3c3eece96e8196669d9e23ec38621c
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/zstarfile/refs/download/v0.2.0/zstarfile-0.2.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : bdb637d63131ebbd5bf8a047e3140017fc5b32fec80f1ddcfd4e9b2ebe828dfb
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bdb637d63131ebbd5bf8a047e3140017fc5b32fec80f1ddcfd4e9b2ebe828dfb


Requires
--------
python3-zstarfile (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python3-zstarfile:
    python-zstarfile
    python3-zstarfile
    python3.12-zstarfile
    python3.12dist(zstarfile)
    python3dist(zstarfile)

Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name python-zstarfile --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python
Disabled plugins: fonts, Ocaml, PHP, SugarActivity, C/C++, Java, Perl, Haskell, R
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-04-12 16:14:51 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-zstarfile

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2024-04-12 16:22:52 UTC
FEDORA-2024-40a4352e4e (python-zstarfile-0.2.0-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-40a4352e4e

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2024-04-12 16:27:25 UTC
FEDORA-2024-40a4352e4e (python-zstarfile-0.2.0-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.