Bug 2274499
| Summary: | Not all csi-addons containers run with read-only filesystem | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Niels de Vos <ndevos> |
| Component: | csi-addons | Assignee: | Niels de Vos <ndevos> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Filip Balák <fbalak> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.14 | CC: | asriram, etamir, fbalak, kbg, muagarwa, nberry, odf-bz-bot, sheggodu |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
| Target Release: | ODF 4.14.9 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.14.9-2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, the security scanners or checkers reported that the `csi-addons-controller-manager` pod does not have "readOnlyRootFilesystem" option enabled as the pod does not have this option enabled explicitly.
With this fix, in the deployment of the `csi-addons-controller-manager` pod, "readOnlyRootFilesystem" is set to `true`. As a result, the security scanners or checkers no longer report the missing "readOnlyRootFilesystem" option for csi-addons-controller-manager.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 2268065 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2024-07-02 11:02:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2268065 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Niels de Vos
2024-04-11 11:52:22 UTC
Please backport the fix to ODF-4.14 and update the RDT flag/text appropriately. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.14.9 Bug Fix Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:4217 |