Bug 2276414

Summary: Review Request: perl-Call-Context - Sanity-check calling context
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Oliver <mavit>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jplesnik, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jplesnik: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Call-Context
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-10-10 00:16:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2276416    
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8091872 to 8092172 none

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-04-23 00:49:00 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Jitka Plesnikova 2024-09-30 10:30:39 UTC
ERROR: 'Error HTTP Error 404: Not Found downloading https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mavit/perlimports/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07396234-perl-Call-Context/perl-Call-Context-0.05-1.fc41.src.rpm'

Please provide the source rpm.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 10:46:52 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8091872
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2276414-perl-call-context/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08091872-perl-Call-Context/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Jitka Plesnikova 2024-09-30 11:28:43 UTC
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed

BuildRequires are ok
BuildRequires
FIX: Add build-requires
     coreutils it is needed for %{_fixperms}
     perl(strict) - lib/Call/Context.pm:78
     perl(warnings) - lib/Call/Context.pm:79

If you don't want to add it to EPEL 7, please consider fixing
these 'TODO' items:
TODO: Add "NO_PACKLIST=1 NO_PERLLOCAL=1" to 'perl Makefile.PL'
      If you use option NO_PACKLIST=1, please add version constrain
      to ExtUtils::MakeMaker >= 6.76
      Remove "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;".
TODO: Use %{make_install} instead of "make pure_install".

TODO: Remove "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'"
      It's not needed.

$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Call-Context-0.05-1.fc42.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib
      1 perl-libs
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -qp --provides perl-Call-Context-0.05-1.fc42.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
      1 perl(Call::Context) = 0.05
      1 perl-Call-Context = 0.05-1.fc42
      1 perl(Call::Context::X)
Binary provides are Ok.

Rpmlint is ok

TODO: The package does not contain directory %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/, you
      can remove '%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/'

TODO: Explicitly name packaged files in %{_mandir}/man* and %{perl_vendorlib} directories
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_lists.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.
Please correct all 'FIX' items, consider fixing 'TODO' items and provide a new spec file.

Resolution:
NOT Approved

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 12:38:49 UTC
Created attachment 2049552 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8091872 to 8092172

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 12:38:51 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8092172
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2276414-perl-call-context/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08092172-perl-Call-Context/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 10 Jitka Plesnikova 2024-10-01 10:56:39 UTC
It looks good now.

Resolution:
Approved

Comment 11 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-10-01 14:41:23 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Call-Context

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2024-10-01 15:01:03 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308 (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2024-10-01 15:07:26 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b63605368a (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b63605368a

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2024-10-01 15:17:54 UTC
FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4 (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2024-10-02 02:52:03 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b63605368a has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-b63605368a \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b63605368a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2024-10-02 02:55:10 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2024-10-02 03:43:41 UTC
FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2024-10-10 00:16:41 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b1eb8e4308 (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2024-10-10 00:50:59 UTC
FEDORA-2024-99d9369dc4 (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc39) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2024-10-10 02:00:19 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b63605368a (perl-Call-Context-0.05-6.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.