Bug 2276427

Summary:	superlu_dist-mpich-devel provides the library libblas.so
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	david08741
Component:	superlu_dist	Assignee:	Dave Love <dave.love>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	42	CC:	dave.love, mark.e.fuller
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	superlu_dist-8.2.0-10.el10_1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-08-15 18:43:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description david08741 2024-04-22 13:59:11 UTC

Description of problem:
superlu_dist-mpich depends on superlu_dist-mpich-devel

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
superlu_dist-mpich-devel-1:8.2.0-3.fc40.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf5 install superlu_dist-mpich

Actual results:
superlu_dist-mpich-devel is pulled in. This seems to be caused by a dependency on libblas.so()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)

Expected results:
superlu_dist-mpich-devel and gcc etc is not installed

Additional info:
superlu_dist-mpich:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=37667341
superlu_dist-mpich-devel
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=37667345

/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libblas.so is part of superlu_dist-mpich-devel but is not a symlink
libblas should not be part of superlu_dist as far as I can tell.

Comment 1 david08741 2024-04-23 12:01:00 UTC

I have a fix here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/superlu_dist/pull-request/4

Comment 2 Aoife Moloney 2025-02-26 13:01:28 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle.
Changing version to 42.

Comment 3 Dave Love 2025-08-12 14:42:28 UTC

I didn't realize this was outstanding.  The suggested fix doesn't work for me, but I think i can see what's wrong.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-08-27 10:28:39 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d562e2655f (superlu_dist-8.2.0-10.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d562e2655f

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-08-28 01:40:42 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d562e2655f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d562e2655f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-09-05 02:16:15 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d562e2655f (superlu_dist-8.2.0-10.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.