Bug 22785

Summary: Fata Error Communicating With Server
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: David Highley <david.m.highley>
Component: up2dateAssignee: Preston Brown <pbrown>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-12-27 21:56:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Highley 2000-12-23 20:46:04 UTC 
Updated program up2date with the following rpms:
i386:
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/i386/up2date-2.1.7-0.6.x.i386.rpm
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/i386/up2date-gnome-2.1.7-0.6.x.i386.rpm
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/i386/python-xmlrpc-1.2.1-0.6.x.i386.rpm
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/i386/python-1.5.2-27.6.x.i386.rpm

noarch:
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/noarch/rhn_register-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/noarch/rhn_register-gnome-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm

First ran into the confusion about whether the product had been registered.
So I
tried to re-register the product which failed because it was all ready
registered.

Tried an anonymous down load and foud that the registration was found, but
the
down load fails.

Error is:
There was a fatal error communicating with the server. The message was:
invalid Architecture and OS release combination
Comment 1 Preston Brown 2000-12-27 21:56:30 UTC 
Has the problem persisted?
Comment 2 Preston Brown 2001-02-09 05:32:02 UTC 
closed due to lack of feedback and inability to duplicate; lack of other similar
reports.