Bug 2278599
Summary: | [RGW]: Bucket owner change fails on a bucket with rate limit set | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Tejas <tchandra> |
Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Chaithra <ckulal> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Disha Walvekar <dwalveka> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ckulal, mbenjamin, rpollack, tserlin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 7.1z3 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-18.2.1-284.el9cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.`merge_and_store_attrs()` method no longer causes attribute update operations to fail
Previously, a bug in the `merge_and_store_attrs()` method, which deals with reconciling changed and the unchanged bucket instance attributes, caused some attribute update operations to fail silently. Due to this, some metadata operations on a subset of buckets would fail. For example, a bucket owner change would fail on a bucket with a rate limit set.
With this fix, the `merge_and_store_attrs()` method is fixed and all affected scenarios now work correctly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 2262919 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2025-02-24 15:42:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2262919 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 2267614, 2298578, 2298579 |
Description
Tejas
2024-05-02 08:46:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security, bug fix, enhancement, and known issue updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:1770 |