python-jedi fails to build with Python 3.13.0b1.
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
______________________ test_completion_param_annotations _______________________
def test_completion_param_annotations():
# Need to define this function not directly in Python. Otherwise Jedi is too
# clever and uses the Python code instead of the signature object.
code = 'def foo(a: 1, b: str, c: int = 1.0) -> bytes: pass'
exec(code, locals())
script = jedi.Interpreter('foo', [locals()])
> c, = script.complete()
E ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 1, got 0)
test/test_api/test_interpreter.py:315: ValueError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED test/test_api/test_interpreter.py::test_completion_param_annotations
https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07443586-python-jedi/
For all our attempts to build python-jedi with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/python-jedi/
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
Comment 3Fedora Update System
2024-07-08 06:32:29 UTC
FEDORA-2024-45812c43d6 (python-jedi-0.19.1-8.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.