Bug 228160
Summary: | multi-lib conflicts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
Component: | claws-mail | Assignee: | Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-02-28 11:41:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 213321 |
Description
Michael Schwendt
2007-02-10 22:51:09 UTC
Hm any thoughs on this before I push 2.8.0? I wonder why this is an issue at all because /usr/bin/claws-mail should be exactly where it is and the other stuff is just uninteresting (probably could be removed anyway). The binary is uninteresting. The Makefiles cause the conflict. There are lots of "Makefile.am" and "Makefile.in" in the doc tree, too. [...] But how usable is the -devel package anyway? It contains many headers, but no libraries. Is all this only for plugins? In that case, the -devel package need not require the main package. And as a result, the i386 main package would not be copied into the x86_64 repository either. To start with I removed the Makfile{,.am,.in} they are not needed anyway. For the later: I think the headers are only used by the plugins but I will give it a try with the plugins package and if it works I will remove the Require on the main package... Should be fixed with next push. |