Bug 228209

Summary: pgg.elc missing from emacs-common
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Need Real Name <bugzilla>
Component: emacsAssignee: Chip Coldwell <coldwell>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-05 20:16:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2007-02-11 17:24:07 UTC
Description of problem:

emacs-common is missing the elisp file pgg.el/pgg.elc which is part of the
latest GNUS sources and is required for pgp signing, etc.

Would it be possible to make sure that this library is included in an updated
version of emacs-common? (which is where gnus.elc is)

Thanks

Comment 1 Chip Coldwell 2007-02-14 15:11:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> emacs-common is missing the elisp file pgg.el/pgg.elc which is part of the
> latest GNUS sources and is required for pgp signing, etc.

I'm disinclined to backport this for emacs-21.  Have you tried emacs-22?

http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/emacs/fedora/

Chip


Comment 2 Jonathan Underwood 2007-03-09 16:42:15 UTC
Actually, I have backported the pgg.el(c) and friends into the emacs-vm package,
and so if you do yum install emacs-vm, you'll have what you need.

Chip - I probably should've talked to you about this prior to doing it, sorry.
But, do you forsee any problems in me doing this? Would it be better if the pgg
stuff was in it's own sub-package so it was available outside of emacs-vm?


Comment 3 Chip Coldwell 2007-04-05 20:16:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Actually, I have backported the pgg.el(c) and friends into the emacs-vm package,
> and so if you do yum install emacs-vm, you'll have what you need.
> 
> Chip - I probably should've talked to you about this prior to doing it, sorry.
> But, do you forsee any problems in me doing this? Would it be better if the pgg
> stuff was in it's own sub-package so it was available outside of emacs-vm?

That's up to you, if you're maintaining those packages.  I guess the major use
of pgp is for email, so maybe it's better to reduce the proliferation of packages.

Chip