Bug 2283640

(In reply to simon.c.dalzell from comment #0)
> Arun Babu Neelicattu <arun.neelicattu> has packaged the
> web-eid-app [2]. The spec file is located at [3]. The built packages are
> available on copr [4]. 
> 
> [1]
> https://www.id.ee/en/article/configuring-google-chrome-for-using-the-id-card/
> [2] https://github.com/web-eid/web-eid-app
> [3] https://github.com/abn/web-eid-rpm
> [4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/abn/web-eid/


Hello Arun, would you like to join open-eid maintainers by porting your RPM in official Fedora repositories?

Package Review is welcome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298838

Hi Germano. Happy to help the best I can. Apologies for the delay in responding here, been busy lately.

Let me know what I can do right now to help.

(In reply to Arun Babu Neelicattu from comment #3)
> Hi Germano. Happy to help the best I can. Apologies for the delay in
> responding here, been busy lately.
> 
> Let me know what I can do right now to help.

Hi, I am about to include your package into Fedora repositories and add you as co-maintainer. I saw that your FAS account is not in the list of official Fedora packagers. In order to be an official Fedora package maintainer you need to go through https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
I can be your sponsor

Hi Dmitri, are you able to do the package review of web-eid? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298838

Hello Arun, you are not yet a member of Fedora packager group, so I cannot add you among web-eid admins.
This is the procedure
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
I am available to sponsor you
Cheers

Can anybody please login and leave a karma feedback?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=web-eid

I also updated open-eid meta package, can you please login and leave a karma feedback? Is quite urgent
F40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4369320abd
F39 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3b8ecb5149

I have left karma feedbacks for bot F40 and F41. - a bit too late I guess :(

(In reply to Arun Babu Neelicattu from comment #9)
> I have left karma feedbacks for bot F40 and F41. - a bit too late I guess :(

Hi, yes but currently these builds reached stable branch anyways

Following up on DM conversation with Germano, one thing I noticed while building the spec file locally was that the source file in the build environment is not the same as the source defined in the spec file. Unsure if I should raise a new ticket for this one.

> $ cat sources 
> SHA512 (web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz) = 1ab370c3553ef04145e66577c93ea25310c385409a0f23aff3b20f41cd4ce2664abf914f9c8b985b269550e24f04fbda53fcad3867db073b6f2600dfb0836f0b
> $ fedpkg sources
> Downloading web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz from https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs
> ######################################################################## 100.0%
> $ sha512sum web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz 
> 1ab370c3553ef04145e66577c93ea25310c385409a0f23aff3b20f41cd4ce2664abf914f9c8b985b269550e24f04fbda53fcad3867db073b6f2600dfb0836f0b  web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz

Source file specified as SOURCE0:
> $ curl -sL https://github.com/web-eid/web-eid-app/archive/v2.5.0/web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz | sha512sum -
> 629f797e1d28c370480fc2b57a580c93e42eecb9fbd07a0d6c23b184f7420992a776931eb38cdbf5fca87bdc6d347f1f3ef6185990cc8a1f43ad09c8aa7071e3  -

The delta is the content inside the submodule directory lib/libelectronic-id.

> $ tar tf web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz  | grep "lib/libelectronic-id" | wc -l
> 146
> $ curl -sL https://github.com/web-eid/web-eid-app/archive/v2.5.0/web-eid-2.5.0.tar.gz | tar -ztf - | grep "lib/libelectronic-id" | wc -l
> 1

I could not find much on what the expectation is on source trees with submodules.

Let's continue the discussion at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2325424