Bug 228369
Summary: | kannel multi-lib conflicts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
Component: | kannel | Assignee: | Matthias Saou <matthias> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-06-14 17:25:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael Schwendt
2007-02-12 20:11:38 UTC
Ouch. Is this really to be considered a bug? I really hope not... These files are created at build time. The probably contain some timestamp which makes them slightly different from one buildd to another. I do not see any easy way to fix this, nor do I see it as being something useful to "fix" since I don't think this package makes sense as multilib. Should I remove all files which make the devel sub-package in order to no longer have it? ... (yeah, I don't particularly like multilib...) It could be that %_defaultdocdir (/usr/share/doc) for some versions of rpm contains hacks to work around multi-lib conflicts (cf. bug 228372). Yup, all versions of rpm I know "work around" the problem already. And if it was left up to me, I would not make kannel available as multilib, since there isn't much (any at all?) point in doing so. So I'll close as WONTFIX. But I _will_ take care of non worked around multilib issues like in bug #228177 and bug #228359. |