Bug 2284154
Summary: | [IBM Support] S3 session policy behavior on batch deletes returns AccessDenied for all keys | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Mike Hackett <mhackett> |
Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hemanth Sai <hmaheswa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | akraj, bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, mbenjamin, mkasturi, rpollack, tserlin, vereddy |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | AutoVerified |
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-19.1.1-49.el9cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.Batch object deleting is now allowed, with IAM policy permissions
Previously, during a batch delete process, also known as multi object delete, due to the incorrect evaluation of IAM policies returned `AccessDenied` output if no explicit or implicit deny were present. The `AccessDenied` occurred even if there were Allow privileges. As a result, batch deleting fails with the `AccessDenied` error.
With this fix, the policies are evaluated as expected and batch deleting succeeds, when IAM policies are enabled.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 2284153 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2024-11-25 09:01:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2284153, 2298712 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 2317218 |
Description
Mike Hackett
2024-05-31 20:07:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216 |