Bug 228433

Summary:	perl-version: EPEL branch?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Chris Weyl <cweyl>
Component:	perl-version	Assignee:	Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	paul, perl-devel
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	notting: fedora-cvs+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-07-03 17:54:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:01:05 UTC

A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4.  Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)

(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)

Comment 1 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:11:48 UTC

Erm, scratch that last bit.  The spec does indeed build via Makefile.PL.

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:51:38 UTC

...and to build on that, it would appear that since the spec is using
Makefile.PL to build, the buildreq on perl(Module::Build) >= 0.2611 is spurious.
 perl-version builds nicely in mock with that br removed and without other
alterations.

Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-04-04 23:04:20 UTC

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: tcallawa
Updated EPEL CC: fedora-perl-devel-list

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2007-04-06 05:59:06 UTC

added

Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-07-03 17:54:17 UTC

Built. Sorry it took so long. :/

Comment 6 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 08:27:30 UTC

We resurrected this package for dual-life modules. Could it be brought to life again? It's already unblocked, but now we are missing permissions.

Spot, if you like, add yourself among maintainers.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14 EL-6
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 7 Paul Howarth 2011-01-31 10:00:09 UTC

I don't think we can add an EL-6 branch as that would update a package from RHEL-6.

Comment 8 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 10:45:27 UTC

You are right.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2011-02-02 22:28:33 UTC

Git done (by process-git-requests).