Bug 228510
Summary: | Please update opencv to 1.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster> |
Component: | opencv | Assignee: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | nomis80 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-02-20 13:46:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mary Ellen Foster
2007-02-13 14:20:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > OpenCV 1.0 has been released since November, but the version in Extras is still > 0.9.9. It would be good to update to the final version. 1.0 is in fc7 since December ;) Unfortunately upgrading fc6 is not easily doable, because opencv upstream had chosen to break the SONAME between 0.9.9 and 1.0 (0.9.9 ships lib*.0, 1.0 ships lib*.1) i.e. an upgrade to 1.0 in FC6 would break package dependencies. Can the bug be closed with NEXTRELEASE then? (In reply to comment #2) > Can the bug be closed with NEXTRELEASE then? Not yet, because I am seriously considering to upgrade. If and how depends on a couple of questions yet to be clarified. (In reply to comment #3) One week has passed, and despite a warning on the fedora-extras-list, nobody has objected, nor insisted on a compat-opencv. Therefore, I've taken the plunge and pushed a build of opencv-1.0.0 for fc6. Package should appear with the next round of FE releases (SONAME breakages guaranteed). |