Bug 2290496

Summary:	update the Apostrophe RPM to v3.0 for Fedora 40
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Todd Warner <t0dd>
Component:	apostrophe	Assignee:	Artem <ego.cordatus>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	40	CC:	ego.cordatus, shehrozrehman02
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-07-04 09:43:30 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Todd Warner 2024-06-05 02:41:42 UTC

Apostrophe sat for a very long time (for years) at version 2.6.3 as the developer(s) overhauled the code to GTK4 and made other improvements. They finished that in May, 2024. Version 3.0 was released to Flathub and has been built as an RPM for Fedora 41.

Can we please build and release it for Fedora 40 and put that ancient 2.6 codebase to bed? Pretty please?


Thanks. -t

Comment 1 Artem 2024-06-05 09:03:41 UTC

> Can we please build and release it for Fedora 40 and put that ancient 2.6 codebase to bed? 

We can't Unfortunately, see: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-84fc5db100#comment-3519202

Upstream not very happy about any non-flatpak build in general. So probably we should retire Apostrophe completely from Fedora repos. In same time Apostrophe developer said that he will try push downstream patches of  libspelling and sourceview into upstream of this libs. But the question is what Fedora should do until then?

Comment 2 Todd Warner 2024-06-06 18:10:21 UTC

Gotcha. Makes sense and I can empathize with upsteam (trying to control the permutations of builds).

I just prefer RPMs versus Flatpaks in most cases. Ah well. Thank you for responding. You can close this if you like.

Comment 3 Artem 2024-06-08 11:19:02 UTC

> I just prefer RPMs versus Flatpaks in most cases. You can close this if you like.

Me too. Or Fedora in-house Flatpaks. Let's keep it open since this still unresolved issue. And could be informative for other people to avoid duplicate issues.

Comment 4 Artem 2024-07-04 09:43:30 UTC

Package retired https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/apostrophe/c/4388062702836c82818741e55f7025e99e99953f?branch=rawhide

Comment 5 Artem 2024-07-28 18:17:27 UTC

*** Bug 2300249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***