Bug 2291362 (CVE-2024-27309)

Summary:	CVE-2024-27309 Kafka: Potential incorrect access control during migration from ZK mode to KRaft mode
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	Marco Benatto <mbenatto>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Product Security <prodsec-ir-bot>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	chazlett, chfoley, jscholz, swoodman
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:	A flaw was found in Apache Kafka during the migration from ZooKeeper (ZK) to KRaft mode that affects Access Control List (ACL) enforcement. Specifically, when an ACL is removed from a resource and the resource retains two or more other ACLs, Kafka may incorrectly treat the resource as having only one ACL. This issue can lead to misconfigured access permissions during the migration period. Depending on the type of ACLs (ALLOW or DENY) in use, the impact ranges from potential availability issues (for ALLOW ACLs) to confidentiality and integrity risks (for DENY ACLs). The bug can be mitigated by resetting broker states or adding new ACLs without causing metadata loss.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2291403

Description Marco Benatto 2024-06-11 20:26:21 UTC

While an Apache Kafka cluster is being migrated from ZooKeeper mode to KRaft mode, in some cases ACLs will not be correctly enforced.

Two preconditions are needed to trigger the bug:
1. The administrator decides to remove an ACL
2. The resource associated with the removed ACL continues to have two or more other ACLs associated with it after the removal.

When those two preconditions are met, Kafka will treat the resource as if it had only one ACL associated with it after the removal, rather than the two or more that would be correct.

The incorrect condition is cleared by removing all brokers in ZK mode, or by adding a new ACL to the affected resource. Once the migration is completed, there is no metadata loss (the ACLs all remain).

The full impact depends on the ACLs in use. If only ALLOW ACLs were configured during the migration, the impact would be limited to availability impact. if DENY ACLs were configured, the impact could include confidentiality and integrity impact depending on the ACLs configured, as the DENY ACLs might be ignored due to this vulnerability during the migration period.

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/3
https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy