Bug 229230
| Summary: | gphoto2 can stop manage permissions now | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Zeuthen <davidz> |
| Component: | gphoto2 | Assignee: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mclasen, pknirsch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | EasyFix, Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-02-21 11:19:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 150226 | ||
|
Description
David Zeuthen
2007-02-19 17:25:28 UTC
Happily removed. Thanks - but you removed a bit too much; this file /usr/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty/10-camera-libgphoto2.fdi is still needed since it's used to classify USB interfaces as being cameras. Without this HAL won't know the USB device is a camera. Thanks. I meant /usr/share/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty/10-camera-libgphoto2.fdi of course. 10-camera-libgphoto2.fdi is now added back. Today, there are 2 problems with gphoto2 and acl-management in Fedora 8. First, the hal-rule for "main usb devices" into /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/20-acl-management.fdi begin at line 61 will not match. My Device (Canon PowerShot S45) returns info.subsystem = 'usb_device' (string). Is the rule <match key="info.subsystem" contains="usb"> better at this line?? The second problem is the fdi-information file into gphoto2-package. Checking for usb-bus works only with string="usb_device" or contains="usb". If the device has no key "usb.interface_class", all camara-rules will be skipped. I think there is no need for skipping usb storage devices or we need a better determination rule. At least, the keys "usb.vendor_id", "usb.product_id" are changed to "usb_device.vendor_id", "usb_device.product_id" best regards, andreas |