Bug 229346

Summary:	NFS fix - gfs_decode_fh
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Wendy Cheng <nobody+wcheng>
Component:	gfs-kmod	Assignee:	Wendy Cheng <nobody+wcheng>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	GFS Bugs <gfs-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.0	CC:	kanderso, rkenna
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2007-0577	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-11-07 20:06:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	229345
Bug Blocks:

Description Wendy Cheng 2007-02-20 15:10:27 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #229345 +++

Description of problem:
GFS(s) expects NFS fh_type and fh_len would have the same value. 
This is apparently not correct. One obvious symptom is that 
it will fail NFS V2 (which uses fixed fh_len for all requests) 
mount command. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All

How reproducible:
Depending on NFS request types - for v2 mount command, it fails
each time and every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
Mount GFS(s) partitions on NFS clients using NFS v2 protocol. 

Actual results:
The command fails with ESTALE error.

Expected results:
Mount succeeds. 

Additional info:
Patch has submitted to cluster-devel list.

Comment 1 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-04-23 17:39:18 UTC

Fixing product name. Cluster Suite components were integrated into Enterprise
Linux for verion 5.0.

Comment 2 Wendy Cheng 2007-05-08 18:12:29 UTC

Code checked into CVS.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 20:06:16 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0577.html