Bug 2297708
| Summary: | Review Request: libsrm - Library for building DRM/KMS applications | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Yanko Kaneti <yaneti> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, yaneti |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | yaneti:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-07-23 09:32:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2297711 | ||
|
Description
Neal Gompa
2024-07-13 16:33:44 UTC
Perhaps "SRM" instead of "srm" ? And just noticed that rpms/srm is already taken https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/srm/ Let's try libsrm... Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/louvre/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07749368-libsrm/libsrm.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/louvre/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07749368-libsrm/libsrm-0.6.3_1-1.fc41.src.rpm Well, SRM or libSRM would've made more sense to me, but at least this way we would be matching Debian. Name is appropriate (now) Doesn't conflict License matches. Builds in mock. APPROVED The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsrm Already built and in a rawhide compose. Closing. |