Bug 229856

Summary: escd free on invalid pointer
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Jason Edgecombe <jedgecombe>
Component: escAssignee: Jack Magne <jmagne>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: shillman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 20:51:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jason Edgecombe 2007-02-23 20:22:51 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
esc-1.0.0-18.el5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. logout of gdm
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
error in system log:
escd: *** glibc detected *** ./escd: free(): invalid pointer: 0xbf93d104 ***


Expected results:
no error.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jack Magne 2007-02-24 02:43:44 UTC
This bug was fixed in esc-1.0.0-19.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-06-09 22:01:54 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 20:51:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0085.html