Bug 2298710

Summary: [rgw] ratelimit is not enforced after assume-role / role is changed
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Bipin Kunal <bkunal>
Component: RGWAssignee: Pritha Srivastava <prsrivas>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: akraj, bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, mbenjamin, mhackett, prsrivas, rpollack, sbaldwin, tserlin, vereddy, vimishra
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-19.1.1-49.el9cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Quota and rate limit settings for assume-roles are properly enforced for S3 requests with temporary credentials Previously, information of a user using an assume-role was not loaded successfully from the backend store when temporary credentials were being used to serve an S3 request. As a result, the user quota or rate limit settings were not applied with the temporary credentials. With this fix, the information is loaded from the backend store, even when authenticating with temporary credentials and all settings are applied successfully.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2293141 Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-11-25 09:03:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2293141, 2298711, 2317218    

Description Bipin Kunal 2024-07-18 16:49:32 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2293141 +++

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-25 09:03:35 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216