Bug 2299038
| Summary: | Review Request: python-flatbencode - Fast, safe and non-recursive implementation of Bittorrent bencoding | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Moerner <dmoerner> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fschwarz, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | AutomationTriaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://github.com/acatton/flatbencode | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-10-18 12:44:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Daniel Moerner
2024-07-20 19:06:30 UTC
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7767607 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2299038-python-flatbencode/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07767607-python-flatbencode/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Daniel, the spec file looks good at a first glance. I noticed that the last change in the upstream repo was 8 years ago. Are you sure you need that library? Maybe this library is just "done" for what it is supposed to do but just a quick confirmation would be nice before I start reviewing this in detail. (In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #2) > Daniel, the spec file looks good at a first glance. I noticed that the last > change in the upstream repo was 8 years ago. Are you sure you need that > library? Maybe this library is just "done" for what it is supposed to do but > just a quick confirmation would be nice before I start reviewing this in > detail. Hi Felix, Thanks for taking a look at this! I spent some time looking into what I was planning to use this for, and I think you're right that it's better to try to find a more modern solution. I'm going to go ahead and withdraw this request and close the bug. |